<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>edbuzz.org &#187; one-to-one computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edbuzz.org/tag/one-to-one-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edbuzz.org</link>
	<description>Integrating technology and learning...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which States Rank at the Top When It Comes to One-to-One Computing?</title>
		<link>http://edbuzz.org/sroner/2009/09/which-states-rank-at-the-top-when-it-comes-to-one-to-one-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://edbuzz.org/sroner/2009/09/which-states-rank-at-the-top-when-it-comes-to-one-to-one-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtual Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-to-one computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Red]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edbuzz.org/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article published in eSchool News entitled &#8220;1-to-1 Computing in the Spotlight,&#8221; Laura Devaney reports on a few interesting findings from a recent study conducted by Project Red. Based on a close examination of nationwide data, the project &#8230; <a href="http://edbuzz.org/sroner/2009/09/which-states-rank-at-the-top-when-it-comes-to-one-to-one-computing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent article published in eSchool News entitled <a href="http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?print&amp;i=60444">&#8220;1-to-1 Computing in the Spotlight,&#8221;</a> Laura Devaney reports on a few interesting findings from a recent study conducted by <a href="http://www.projectred.org/">Project Red</a>. Based on a close examination of nationwide data, the project determined the percentage of schools in each state which provide  ubiquitous computer access.</p>
<p><span id="more-851"></span></p>
<p>According to the study,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<span>South Dakota, Maine, and Wyoming top the list of states with the highest percentage of schools that have ubiquitous (one-to-one) computing programs for their students&#8211;while California (50) ranks last in this category&#8230;&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>The study also reveals</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span>&#8220;&#8230;a national average of about 5.4 percent of schools with ubiquitous technology programs, reaching about 4 percent of students.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>Interestingly enough, it seems the smaller states like Missouri (11) , Nebraska (6), and Kansas (4) have had much more success establishing one-to-one access for public school students. </span></p>
<p><span>According to Jean Hayes, </span><span>a Project RED manager, </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span>&#8220;Often, it&#8217;s easier for less populous states to implement statewide education technology initiatives because they have a smaller percentage of the national student population and the costs of such initiatives are less.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Whereas the study found that larger states like New York (29) and California (50), which have made significant investments in educational technology, are reaching a smaller percentage of the respective state&#8217;s student population.</p>
<p>But, ranking states simply based on student access to computer technology may be misleading.</p>
<blockquote><p><span>&#8220;[one-to-one access] isn&#8217;t the end-all, be-all of how they&#8217;re using technology, but it&#8217;s an interesting snapshot of technology access in U.S. schools,&#8221; said Hayes.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fedbuzz.org%2Fsroner%2F2009%2F09%2Fwhich-states-rank-at-the-top-when-it-comes-to-one-to-one-computing%2F&amp;title=Which%20States%20Rank%20at%20the%20Top%20When%20It%20Comes%20to%20One-to-One%20Computing%3F" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://edbuzz.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://edbuzz.org/sroner/2009/09/which-states-rank-at-the-top-when-it-comes-to-one-to-one-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

