The professor, David E. Pritchard, led a research team that analyzed student performance in an online homework system called MasteringPhysics.com during four different semesters. The researchers were able to measure the time spent on each question and look for suspicious work patterns. If a student took less than a minute each answering several complex questions and got them all right, for instance, the system flagged that as likely cheating. “Since one minute is insufficient time to read the problem and enter the several answers typically required, we infer that the quick-solver group is copying the answer from somewhere,” said the researchers in a paper due out today in the free online journal Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research.

Based on later surveys of the same students, researchers found that the culprits typically copied answers from friends, by logging onto a friend’s account on the system to copy work or by getting answers via e-mail or instant message.

For veteran teachers this is hardly a surprising revelation. The complexity of cheating and plagiarism schemes has increased with the rise of technology and ability to transfer information digitally. Cellphones and other devices have made cheating easier than ever, see The Cheating Heart for an overview. Furthermore, despite the education aimed at informing students about copyright and intellectual property, it is clear that generation y and future generations seem to have a different perspective regarding copyright.

While many would point to this as indicating the need for better detection systems, real success comes from successfully encouraging students to choose not to cheat. Restrictive access to technology and more robust detection schemes may seem appealing but lead to students and teachers engaging in a never ending cycle of trying to outsmart one another. This doesn’t mean ignoring cheating or giving it a free pass. In this Web 2.0 world, it does mean, demonstrating a better way and allowing students to make choices. If unethical, according to Professor Pritchard, these choices mean that cheaters will earn the scores they deserve.

In my next article I will outline three keys to building an environment supportive of ethical decision-making. Until then I’d like to hear your comments and observations.

A netbook according to Wikipedia is “… a category of small-sized, low-cost, light weight, lean function subnotebooks optimized for Internet access and core computing functions (e.g., word processing) — either directly from applications installed on the netbook itself or indirectly via cloud computing.

Most netbooks share these characteristics:

• light weight — 2-4 pounds
• small screen — 7-9 inches
• static memory instead of a hard drive
• mechanical keyboard, usually smaller than full-sized
• wireless Internet connectivity
• web-cam, microphone, and speaker
• USB ports and memory card slot
• price less than $400

–See Doug Johnson’s Tech Proof column, Netbooks and Computing in the Clouds.

Most netbooks come with a version of the Linux operating system and this can mean a bit of a learning curve for the user. However, several netbooks have recently been released with Windows XP. In addition, the small screen and often 800 x 600 resolution has been less than satisfactory.

One of the standouts in the netbook category is the Lenovo IdeaPad S10e. This netbook improves upon the general competition by offering Windows XP, a 10.1″ screen, and 1024 x 600 resolution, all for $299. This truly means that providing either students with their own netbook or a check-out cart for teachers to temporarily bring to their classroom is within the reach of most budgets.

For example, a set of twenty of these netbooks, along with wi-fi and a server to provide storage, can be set in place for less than $11,000. Furthermore, once the server and wi-fi are in place, the major cost is the purchase of more netbooks.

While the limited amount of, or no hard drive storage may seem to be a problem, the continuing growth of cloud computing (see Wikipedia’s definition) seems to provide the answer. Information is stored on servers and accessed via the Internet. Applications rather than being desktop based are generally browser based. This allows access of data at any location where an Internet connection is available (WI-FI or ethernet).

One of the best known and most often sited examples of cloud computing is Google Apps. Google Apps Education Edition is:

• 7.289117 GB / account of email, shared calendar, and collaboration tools right from the browser
• Free with no advertising for students, faculty and staff
• Ready to integrate with many APIs and use of Open Standards
• Add-on security and compliance tools available at a 66% educational discount
• Google Video for education.

Another example is Zoho an online office tools suite. Some of the common applications Zoho provides are:

• email and chat
• word processing, spreadsheets, and presentation
• online document storage and sharing tools
• wikis

Using either of the suites mentioned above would provide for a fairly robust learning process, both inside and outside of the traditional classroom walls.

Imagine, students could perform lab experiments and chart the results in a spreadsheet application, with the file stored online, all team members could contribute data and observations, at any location. During this phase, a wiki could be utilized to share further information, questions, and to work as a group to learn. The data could be summarized in an official scientific essay (English and Science skills), posted to the wiki for others to view and comment upon (Technology and communication skills), and finally presented in a short, powerful form (Presentation and Interpersonal skills), all while focusing on scientific method, reasoning, and experimentation. A powerful recipe for full purpose learning.

I look forward to your comments, suggestions, and ideas…